I don't want equality for all anymore. That's what has led to immigrants having the upper hand whenever things like this happen. I want preferential treatment for native people in the same way it would be given in Lagos, Delhi, Rawalpindi or Beijing to their people against a foreigner.
I worked with a Russian girl (an anti-Putin one) in an overseas office, and she told me last year that in Russia if a foreigner bothered her, she knew the police would always take her side (unless, of course, she were at an anti-Kremlin protest....). But, yes, I have lived in a lot of foreign countries, and I have never seen the police automatically take the foreign migrant's side as official policy.
A guest in the house doesn't treat it the same as the family that own it. My people have been in this place a thousand years so anyone that's been here a couple of decades is still a guest at this point. They can pay more tax, not qualify for free hospitals, definitely not get to be cruel to animals or wander about with knives for their bloody religion & should be held to a higher standard by the police. I'm F"n sick of "equality" for any goatherder or hottentot that chooses to waltz through terminal 4 at Heathrow or invade on a rubber boat & proceed to make themselves comfortable on the nations setee & piss on the nations toilet seat.
I hesitate to condemn police for callousness, because the nature of that job demands you either become callous or suffer the consequences to your mental health.
It is certainly true that the selection, training and culture of the police installs not only the moral certitude of the liberal position, but that racism is the third rail that will kill your career dead in its tracks. All job applications and promotions within the police demand proof of one's commitment to DEI through tangible, recorded actions. You can't bluff or blow smoke. You need the paperwork to prove it or you'll be a constable working night shift until you're 55.
In aviation crash investigation, there's a distinction between pilot error and human error. Pilot error is flying drunk or aiming the nose at a mountain because of the third divorce. Human error is used to describe flaws that emerge because the system generates opportunity for mistakes, like making a lever for lowering flaps the same as lowering the landing gear. The responsibility of a system/design is acknowledged, rather than merely shovelled onto the man who died in the wreckage.
I'm far more interested in seeing the Macpherson report torn out of the police by the roots. The officers were trained and nurtured in a system of incentives that drive this behaviour. The Home Office will not hesitate to throw the responding officers under the bus to preserve the status quo.
I think actual unrest will remain unorganized and sporadic; the real hazard is the ongoing attempt by the richer and more politically savvy to house immigrants in every village and shire. Currently, they're aloof libdem voters, but when they come face to face with it, which they increasingly are, the right wing lurch will become even more pronounced.
Not, by the way, because they all became nationalists, but through self interest, cynical as that is.
The moneyed classes, especially the Zio-affiliated are insulated from the negatives of diversity, they will build walls, if they haven't already started to do so. The English, Scots and Irish working class are regarded as a sponge to mop up the blood and semen, while some Zio rubs his/her hands.
That is becoming increasingly challenging. Britain is not America. It is too small to balkanise. The diversity is everywhere. They may not live next door but they are in your supermarket and their kids at t your kids' school. Even the Notting Hill brigade are now feeling this.
Years to go before anything fractures. Americans tolerate grotesque amounts of depredation from minorities, as do South Africans. As long as water flows from the tap and the lights turn on, the government will remain at the helm.
Hells' teeth, we've passed that point, there can be no return for US, but as for THEM, just make them go. Get rid pronto, I want peace, I want to be left alone, send them back. If that all sound like a cop-out, sorry I'm all out of f's to give. It's always the in-breds, surely people notice? I notice. On the positive side, marginal, but at least it'll do damage to Tommytards and their "based" Sikh allies.
He looks like a pale sh*te brown bar of soap with bug eyes, hair at the edges, dropped on the floor in a communal shower, after a cow sh*t festival. 'Humour and Hatred' is the motto from me at this time, Nick Lowles, or whatever he's called, can go and be Biblical in a land far away.
Is this some “Wizard of Oz” moment when my true identity is revealed? The scene where Toto pulls the curtain to show the “Wizard” as the Carnival man, “Take no notice of the man behind the curtain!” Maybe just one ill thought out reaction, as opposed to “sober and measured”? My ambition in life was to be a Bond villain, urbane sophisticated, a George Sanders type. I know he never played in a Bond film, just a thought.
Thank you, Mr. Morgoth, for cutting through all the BS. It is malice, not incompetence (this applies to the higher-ups making the rules, not the people out on the streets), and the structure has deliberately been set up to be anti-White. I do not think anybody can dispute this in good faith. For me, the question remains (but it´s probably not a question for today), if the system would not have been more prudent and able to achieve greater stability by pursuing the Singaporean approach from the get-go, which from what I understand means very strict rules for everybody. This would have needed to start from the beginning, i.e. decades ago. At this point, the cat is out of the bag.
I would expect that this would have also made the "perception management" of mass immigration easier. But then again, here we are and what do I know.
I have an acquaintance who is very senior in the Met. Highly intelligent, not one of us but not full libtard either. He went for a promotion last year. Down to the last 2. Beaten by the DEI pick.
You are right, of course, in all of this. And right that the system is structurally racist against natives. Indeed, no honest person could look at the laughably named 'Equality Act', with its explicit provisions for the racist and sexist treatment of disfavoured groups, and come to any other conclusion. There's no need for further proof of state racism beyond that act itself, yet proof abounds.
Yet even the case you make here, as correct and mild as it is, is depressingly redolent of Bowden's warning in the Greenwich Speech:
---
And it’s not much fun being a minority, particularly when you’ve been allegedly top dog and been majoritarian in the past. Because then you have to use political correctness and all of these games to protect yourself because they’re really insurance policies that you use as armour in relation to other infractions and other in-groups and people that put things on you. You want a bit for your culture, a bit for your music, a bit for your architecture, a bit for your ancestry, a bit for your flag. And you get a bit, you get a slice, you get a token and you have to be pleased with that because that’s all you’re going to get in a group-based society as this has now become.
---
This piece, as good as it is, and many others like it, bring Bowden's prophecy ringing back to my ears. The tone of so much of the native discussion around this issue is "but what about us? Who will recognise the racism inflicted against us?"
We've been brought so low as a people in our own lands that we'd even be pathetically grateful to actually be allowed an Association of White Police Officers, a 'community leader' in the form of Tommy Robinson if we're unlucky or perhaps Rupert Lowe if we're lucky, an MP or two who have us as their favoured client groups and push for carve outs for us. Brought so low that we'd feel relieved and vindicated for the parliament our ancestors built on the soil of our ancient homeland to treat us as a recognised client group with all the meagre benefits and special pleading that brings.
I say none of this to attack you, or even disagree with you. What you've written here is correct. The UK is structurally racist against us. We need a Macpherson Report of our own. These officers may not have actually committed manslaughter -- the poor lad was effectively dead already when they arrived -- but they need to be our people's sacrificial lamb, as Chauvin was for the blacks, and we need to make our displeasure known if they are allowed off the hook. But even these recognitions of 'structural racism' etc are the tokens awarded to a client group.
I'm aware of this line of thinking, since Bowden, but it is becoming more common. The risk is that we merely become another client group among many, just another 'stakeholder' in Yookay Inc.
Unfortunately, that is increasingly just the reality of the situation. Assuming we one day want to reclaim the entire country, which we do, where do we start, if not by recognizing that we're a group with interests like any, and that our interests are in reclaiming the homeland?
There is no esoteric magical formula of thinking that can be used to overcome the reality of the dire need for real-world space to organize and, indeed, plot from.
Yup, totally agree. This is why I'm not actually attacking you or gainsaying the aim: what else is left to us at this point?
That said, I don't think the regime is ever going to allow white representation to mean remigrationist representation. All the other squabbling ethnic groups can have representation so long as they can be folded under the consumer capitalist, oligarchic, GAE system. Indeed, if natives end up accepting their little slice with their little carve-outs, then native representation is probably possible within the system, otherwise we and the system will always be at loggerheads.
The main thing in our favour is the rising native discontent and the sheer financial impossibility of this madness continuing forever. All unnatural systems have a natural entropy, which requires active work to fight against. For the replacement migrationist state, the natural entropy is the natural distrust of the peoples who make up the state, which must be fought against with a security state, propaganda apparatus, propagandistic 'education' systems etc. This is inordinately expensive to run, and simply won't be able to continue forever. The growing native discontent further raises the cost of this apparatus, shortening this system's time horizons.
I'm still hopeful that in the end we'll get what we want, and I don't disagree with getting what carve-outs we can in the interim. It's just extremely bitter tasting that it's come to this.
The problem is far deeper than "incompetence"or "systemic bias". Laws with skewed incentives and politically-correct TV commentators are merely the visible symptoms of the project. The chains which man must now 'liberate himself from' are post-colonial: the holy cause, as ever, is to create a society dripping with freedom, justice, and goodness generally. The cause is not particularly coherent but cultish, with "racism" [flexibly redefinable] currently taking the leading role as Original Sin, unforgivable and irremediable. Those deemed guilty of the Original Sin must be re-educated, cowed, replaced, expelled, whatever: then whoever is left will be free, and the world will be just. Most people, you see, are just wonderful, given a fair shake.
This cult has now settled in the institutions of the West. The imperative to combat the perceived sins permeates what the opinion makers and legislators impose, and so what we publicly hear, see and read. Its dogma forgives any stupidity, gross negligence, incompetence or even cold-blooded indifference to the fate of "offenders" displayed by the faithful servants in the execution of their sacred (meaning: unchallengeable) duty.
The twentieth century provided ghastly examples of similar experiments (eg the Bolshieviks annihilating various objectionable classes in "work camps" for the Greater Good), dressing up their valueless nihilism with laughable intellectual tropes like "inevitability of dialectical materialism" or "the right side of history". Readers can think of other examples of groups who blamed one part of the population for the ills of all and wished to abolish them from their midst.
In the twenty-first century, the West's former even-handed liberalism appears to have partially rotted into a new such nihilistic cult in the name of anti-colonialism and/or anti-racism. How far it will run, we shall see. But it is an incoherent, intolerant, nihilistic faith system dedicated to effacing opposition, not a thing one can reason with.
I just saw faraj response and he's been forced to tell it like it is , even if he is cynically trying to outflank Rupert lowe. Rupert lowe just called for a referendum on the death penalty in light of the event , he would see off digwa and deport his family
I don't think anything will come of this tragic event. The regime has made it clear it is doubling down. Farage's address to the nation delivered the response that was intended. Young white men, no facial coverings, all putting themselves out there, all for nothing, whilst Yaxley Lennon stirs the pot. It's akin using a circular flow chart algorithm and having the stupidity to expect an outcome that isn't in the descriptors.
Oddly I tend to get emails for paid subscriber articles, but not the free ones.
Your latest monthly review also didn't appear in my podcast app via the rss feed provided by Substack, so I hope it's just some technical issues ongoing and not something more sinister.
This is the second time I published this article, and Substack are still not sending out the notification emails.
For what it's worth, I got the email notification. It came in at :38 past the hour, so it sounds like they're just delayed/congested.
Yeah it's probably just me and my innate technophobia kicking in.
Genuinely haven’t received email notifications for the last few articles, so resort to just periodically checking your page on the app.
I don't want equality for all anymore. That's what has led to immigrants having the upper hand whenever things like this happen. I want preferential treatment for native people in the same way it would be given in Lagos, Delhi, Rawalpindi or Beijing to their people against a foreigner.
I worked with a Russian girl (an anti-Putin one) in an overseas office, and she told me last year that in Russia if a foreigner bothered her, she knew the police would always take her side (unless, of course, she were at an anti-Kremlin protest....). But, yes, I have lived in a lot of foreign countries, and I have never seen the police automatically take the foreign migrant's side as official policy.
A guest in the house doesn't treat it the same as the family that own it. My people have been in this place a thousand years so anyone that's been here a couple of decades is still a guest at this point. They can pay more tax, not qualify for free hospitals, definitely not get to be cruel to animals or wander about with knives for their bloody religion & should be held to a higher standard by the police. I'm F"n sick of "equality" for any goatherder or hottentot that chooses to waltz through terminal 4 at Heathrow or invade on a rubber boat & proceed to make themselves comfortable on the nations setee & piss on the nations toilet seat.
I hesitate to condemn police for callousness, because the nature of that job demands you either become callous or suffer the consequences to your mental health.
It is certainly true that the selection, training and culture of the police installs not only the moral certitude of the liberal position, but that racism is the third rail that will kill your career dead in its tracks. All job applications and promotions within the police demand proof of one's commitment to DEI through tangible, recorded actions. You can't bluff or blow smoke. You need the paperwork to prove it or you'll be a constable working night shift until you're 55.
In aviation crash investigation, there's a distinction between pilot error and human error. Pilot error is flying drunk or aiming the nose at a mountain because of the third divorce. Human error is used to describe flaws that emerge because the system generates opportunity for mistakes, like making a lever for lowering flaps the same as lowering the landing gear. The responsibility of a system/design is acknowledged, rather than merely shovelled onto the man who died in the wreckage.
I'm far more interested in seeing the Macpherson report torn out of the police by the roots. The officers were trained and nurtured in a system of incentives that drive this behaviour. The Home Office will not hesitate to throw the responding officers under the bus to preserve the status quo.
Yep, localize the problem and move on. The cynicism is extraordinary.
people need to go to prison for what happened to Henry Novak. Not just the scum that stabbed him & tried to cover it up.
One question:
How much longer can the British government keep the lid on and maintain order?
Because I'm having serious doubts about their abilty to do so.
Asking for a friend.
I think actual unrest will remain unorganized and sporadic; the real hazard is the ongoing attempt by the richer and more politically savvy to house immigrants in every village and shire. Currently, they're aloof libdem voters, but when they come face to face with it, which they increasingly are, the right wing lurch will become even more pronounced.
Not, by the way, because they all became nationalists, but through self interest, cynical as that is.
I think the days off bending over backwards to please alien populations has come to an end.
The sooner the moneyed classes feel the sharp end of it, the quicker they will come to their senses--if they ever do.
The moneyed classes, especially the Zio-affiliated are insulated from the negatives of diversity, they will build walls, if they haven't already started to do so. The English, Scots and Irish working class are regarded as a sponge to mop up the blood and semen, while some Zio rubs his/her hands.
That is becoming increasingly challenging. Britain is not America. It is too small to balkanise. The diversity is everywhere. They may not live next door but they are in your supermarket and their kids at t your kids' school. Even the Notting Hill brigade are now feeling this.
Years to go before anything fractures. Americans tolerate grotesque amounts of depredation from minorities, as do South Africans. As long as water flows from the tap and the lights turn on, the government will remain at the helm.
Honestly, I was sick of it in the 1980s. And knew the direction it was heading.
And now we are here.
I think the energy cliff this summer (if it happens) will be a real wake up for the masses.
Hells' teeth, we've passed that point, there can be no return for US, but as for THEM, just make them go. Get rid pronto, I want peace, I want to be left alone, send them back. If that all sound like a cop-out, sorry I'm all out of f's to give. It's always the in-breds, surely people notice? I notice. On the positive side, marginal, but at least it'll do damage to Tommytards and their "based" Sikh allies.
I did notice the physiognomy of the murderer fell far short of the Noble warriors of British Imperial lore.
He looks like a pale sh*te brown bar of soap with bug eyes, hair at the edges, dropped on the floor in a communal shower, after a cow sh*t festival. 'Humour and Hatred' is the motto from me at this time, Nick Lowles, or whatever he's called, can go and be Biblical in a land far away.
Steady on Mr Distributist this is far from your usual sober, measured commentary!
Is this some “Wizard of Oz” moment when my true identity is revealed? The scene where Toto pulls the curtain to show the “Wizard” as the Carnival man, “Take no notice of the man behind the curtain!” Maybe just one ill thought out reaction, as opposed to “sober and measured”? My ambition in life was to be a Bond villain, urbane sophisticated, a George Sanders type. I know he never played in a Bond film, just a thought.
The most reposted article "rebutting" this narrative on "X" in the US says he wasn't a true Sikh.
The irony of Sikhs living in the UK and invoking the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy is beyond parody.
(And I'm sorry to say that X, while execrable, brings stories like this that absolutely no one else in America is reporting)
Thank you, Mr. Morgoth, for cutting through all the BS. It is malice, not incompetence (this applies to the higher-ups making the rules, not the people out on the streets), and the structure has deliberately been set up to be anti-White. I do not think anybody can dispute this in good faith. For me, the question remains (but it´s probably not a question for today), if the system would not have been more prudent and able to achieve greater stability by pursuing the Singaporean approach from the get-go, which from what I understand means very strict rules for everybody. This would have needed to start from the beginning, i.e. decades ago. At this point, the cat is out of the bag.
I would expect that this would have also made the "perception management" of mass immigration easier. But then again, here we are and what do I know.
Next question for Bastani - why aren't higher calibre people entering the police? Where have the more competent coppers gone?
Exactly!
I have an acquaintance who is very senior in the Met. Highly intelligent, not one of us but not full libtard either. He went for a promotion last year. Down to the last 2. Beaten by the DEI pick.
DEI
You are right, of course, in all of this. And right that the system is structurally racist against natives. Indeed, no honest person could look at the laughably named 'Equality Act', with its explicit provisions for the racist and sexist treatment of disfavoured groups, and come to any other conclusion. There's no need for further proof of state racism beyond that act itself, yet proof abounds.
Yet even the case you make here, as correct and mild as it is, is depressingly redolent of Bowden's warning in the Greenwich Speech:
---
And it’s not much fun being a minority, particularly when you’ve been allegedly top dog and been majoritarian in the past. Because then you have to use political correctness and all of these games to protect yourself because they’re really insurance policies that you use as armour in relation to other infractions and other in-groups and people that put things on you. You want a bit for your culture, a bit for your music, a bit for your architecture, a bit for your ancestry, a bit for your flag. And you get a bit, you get a slice, you get a token and you have to be pleased with that because that’s all you’re going to get in a group-based society as this has now become.
---
This piece, as good as it is, and many others like it, bring Bowden's prophecy ringing back to my ears. The tone of so much of the native discussion around this issue is "but what about us? Who will recognise the racism inflicted against us?"
We've been brought so low as a people in our own lands that we'd even be pathetically grateful to actually be allowed an Association of White Police Officers, a 'community leader' in the form of Tommy Robinson if we're unlucky or perhaps Rupert Lowe if we're lucky, an MP or two who have us as their favoured client groups and push for carve outs for us. Brought so low that we'd feel relieved and vindicated for the parliament our ancestors built on the soil of our ancient homeland to treat us as a recognised client group with all the meagre benefits and special pleading that brings.
I say none of this to attack you, or even disagree with you. What you've written here is correct. The UK is structurally racist against us. We need a Macpherson Report of our own. These officers may not have actually committed manslaughter -- the poor lad was effectively dead already when they arrived -- but they need to be our people's sacrificial lamb, as Chauvin was for the blacks, and we need to make our displeasure known if they are allowed off the hook. But even these recognitions of 'structural racism' etc are the tokens awarded to a client group.
I'm aware of this line of thinking, since Bowden, but it is becoming more common. The risk is that we merely become another client group among many, just another 'stakeholder' in Yookay Inc.
Unfortunately, that is increasingly just the reality of the situation. Assuming we one day want to reclaim the entire country, which we do, where do we start, if not by recognizing that we're a group with interests like any, and that our interests are in reclaiming the homeland?
There is no esoteric magical formula of thinking that can be used to overcome the reality of the dire need for real-world space to organize and, indeed, plot from.
Yup, totally agree. This is why I'm not actually attacking you or gainsaying the aim: what else is left to us at this point?
That said, I don't think the regime is ever going to allow white representation to mean remigrationist representation. All the other squabbling ethnic groups can have representation so long as they can be folded under the consumer capitalist, oligarchic, GAE system. Indeed, if natives end up accepting their little slice with their little carve-outs, then native representation is probably possible within the system, otherwise we and the system will always be at loggerheads.
The main thing in our favour is the rising native discontent and the sheer financial impossibility of this madness continuing forever. All unnatural systems have a natural entropy, which requires active work to fight against. For the replacement migrationist state, the natural entropy is the natural distrust of the peoples who make up the state, which must be fought against with a security state, propaganda apparatus, propagandistic 'education' systems etc. This is inordinately expensive to run, and simply won't be able to continue forever. The growing native discontent further raises the cost of this apparatus, shortening this system's time horizons.
I'm still hopeful that in the end we'll get what we want, and I don't disagree with getting what carve-outs we can in the interim. It's just extremely bitter tasting that it's come to this.
The problem is far deeper than "incompetence"or "systemic bias". Laws with skewed incentives and politically-correct TV commentators are merely the visible symptoms of the project. The chains which man must now 'liberate himself from' are post-colonial: the holy cause, as ever, is to create a society dripping with freedom, justice, and goodness generally. The cause is not particularly coherent but cultish, with "racism" [flexibly redefinable] currently taking the leading role as Original Sin, unforgivable and irremediable. Those deemed guilty of the Original Sin must be re-educated, cowed, replaced, expelled, whatever: then whoever is left will be free, and the world will be just. Most people, you see, are just wonderful, given a fair shake.
This cult has now settled in the institutions of the West. The imperative to combat the perceived sins permeates what the opinion makers and legislators impose, and so what we publicly hear, see and read. Its dogma forgives any stupidity, gross negligence, incompetence or even cold-blooded indifference to the fate of "offenders" displayed by the faithful servants in the execution of their sacred (meaning: unchallengeable) duty.
The twentieth century provided ghastly examples of similar experiments (eg the Bolshieviks annihilating various objectionable classes in "work camps" for the Greater Good), dressing up their valueless nihilism with laughable intellectual tropes like "inevitability of dialectical materialism" or "the right side of history". Readers can think of other examples of groups who blamed one part of the population for the ills of all and wished to abolish them from their midst.
In the twenty-first century, the West's former even-handed liberalism appears to have partially rotted into a new such nihilistic cult in the name of anti-colonialism and/or anti-racism. How far it will run, we shall see. But it is an incoherent, intolerant, nihilistic faith system dedicated to effacing opposition, not a thing one can reason with.
I just saw faraj response and he's been forced to tell it like it is , even if he is cynically trying to outflank Rupert lowe. Rupert lowe just called for a referendum on the death penalty in light of the event , he would see off digwa and deport his family
Death penalty and deportation of the entire family!
A small step, perhaps; however, we are on the road back to rational and sane governence.
Excellent copy.
I don't think anything will come of this tragic event. The regime has made it clear it is doubling down. Farage's address to the nation delivered the response that was intended. Young white men, no facial coverings, all putting themselves out there, all for nothing, whilst Yaxley Lennon stirs the pot. It's akin using a circular flow chart algorithm and having the stupidity to expect an outcome that isn't in the descriptors.
Our plight reminds me of a Haitian Proverb:
Si bèf te konn fòs yo, majoral pa ta lanse yo.
Translation : If the cows knew their strength, they would not be butchered.
Oddly I tend to get emails for paid subscriber articles, but not the free ones.
Your latest monthly review also didn't appear in my podcast app via the rss feed provided by Substack, so I hope it's just some technical issues ongoing and not something more sinister.
received a delayed email. thanks for another great article.
The most reposted article "rebutting" this narrative on "X" in the US says he wasn't a true Sikh.
The irony of Sikhs living in the UK and invoking the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy is beyond parody.
(And I'm sorry to say that X, while execrable, brings stories like this that absolutely no one else in America is reporting)