Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hypoborean's avatar

Yep, we can see it already can't we. In thirty years time her name will be mentioned on a nigh-weekly basis, just as Stephen Lawrence's name is still today. Yet during the next few decades, hundreds of thousands of more faceless nameless white girls will be raped by Muslims and countless other white families will have their lived ruined by African savagery and yet it'll barely get noted.

SamizBOT's avatar

These media feeding frenzies, especially where white defendants are concerned in this age of the hyper politicization of race and the vilification of whites, have conditioned me to assume that the defendant is actually innocent of his or her supposed crimes. I don't know anything about this case, but I do know that broadcasting to the world that the defendant is actually a manifestation of evil—a la Chauvin—makes it impossible for even the semblance of a fair trial. It's akin to the sickening practice of a filmmaker making a documentary about how so and so is actually a piece of shit, causing an attention hungry DA to bring a case on the basis of the film which of course the entire jury has watched before the proceedings even begin. See Kelly, R.

22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?